For COVID-19 vaccine updates, please review our information guide. For patient eligibility and scheduling availability, please visit VaccineTogetherNY.org.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Decompression Adjacent to Instrumented Segments.

TitleBiomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Decompression Adjacent to Instrumented Segments.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsGrunert P, Reyes PM, Newcomb AGUS, Towne SB, Kelly BP, Theodore N, Härtl R
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume79
Issue6
Pagination895-904
Date Published2016 Dec
ISSN1524-4040
KeywordsBiomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Decompression, Surgical, Humans, Laminectomy, Lumbar Vertebrae, Posture, Range of Motion, Articular, Rotation
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multilevel lumbar stenosis, in which 1 level requires stabilization due to spondylolisthesis, is routinely treated with multilevel open laminectomy and fusion. We hypothesized that a minimally invasive (MI) decompression is biomechanically superior to open laminectomy and may allow decompression of the level adjacent the spondylolisthesis without additional fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanical effect of various decompression procedures adjacent to instrumented segments in cadaver lumbar spines.

METHODS: Conditions tested were (1) L4-L5 instrumentation, (2) L3-L4 MI decompression, (3) addition of partial facetectomy at L3-L4, and (4) addition of laminectomy at L3-L4. Flexibility tests were performed for range of motion (ROM) analysis by applying nonconstraining, pure moment loading during flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Compression flexion tests were performed for motion distribution analysis.

RESULTS: After instrumentation, MI decompression increased flexion-extension ROM at L3-L4 by 13% (P = .03) and axial rotation by 23% (P = .003). Partial facetectomy further increased axial rotation by 15% (P = .03). After laminectomy, flexion-extension ROM further increased by 12% (P = .05), a 38% increase from baseline, and axial rotation by 17% (P = .02), a 58% increase from baseline. MI decompression yielded no significant increase in segmental contribution of motion at L3-L4, in contrast to partial facetectomy and laminectomy (<.05).

CONCLUSION: MI tubular decompression is biomechanically superior to open laminectomy adjacent to instrumented segments. These results lend support to the concept that in patients in whom a multilevel MI decompression is performed, the fusion might be limited to the segments with actual instability.

ABBREVIATION: MI, minimally invasive.

DOI10.1227/NEU.0000000000001419
Alternate JournalNeurosurgery
PubMed ID27580478