For COVID-19 vaccine updates, please review our information guide. For patient eligibility and scheduling availability, please visit VaccineTogetherNY.org.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcome of Silicate-substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP) Ceramic Bone Graft in Spinal Fusion Procedures.

TitleRadiographic and Clinical Outcome of Silicate-substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP) Ceramic Bone Graft in Spinal Fusion Procedures.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsAlimi M, Navarro-Ramirez R, Parikh K, Njoku I, Hofstetter CP, Tsiouris AJ, Härtl R
JournalClin Spine Surg
Volume30
Issue6
PaginationE845-E852
Date Published2017 Jul
ISSN2380-0194
KeywordsBone Substitutes, Bone Transplantation, Calcium Phosphates, Ceramics, Diskectomy, Female, Foramen Magnum, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Silicates, Spinal Fusion, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcome of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (Si-CaP), utilized as a graft substance in spinal fusion procedures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Specific properties of Si-CaP provide the graft with negative surface charge that can result in a positive effect on the osteoblast activity and neovascularization of the bone.

METHODS: This study included those patients who underwent spinal fusion procedures between 2007 and 2011 in which Si-CaP was used as the only bone graft substance. Fusion was evaluated on follow-up CT scans. Clinical outcome was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index, Neck Disability Index, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back, leg, neck, and arm pain.

RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (516 spinal fusion levels) were studied. Surgical procedures consisted of 57 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, 49 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, 44 extreme lateral interbody fusion, 30 posterior cervical fusions, 19 thoracic fusion surgeries, 17 axial lumbar interbody fusions, 16 combined anterior and posterior cervical fusions, and 2 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. At a mean radiographic follow-up of 14.2±4.3 months, fusion was found to be present in 82.9% of patients and 86.8% of levels. The highest fusion rate was observed in the cervical region. At the latest clinical follow-up of 21.7±14.2 months, all clinical outcome parameters showed significant improvement. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 45.6 to 13.3 points, Neck Disability Index from 40.6 to 29.3, VAS back from 6.1 to 3.5, VAS leg from 5.6 to 2.4, VAS neck from 4.7 to 2.7, and VAS arm from 4.1 to 1.7. Of 7 cases with secondary surgical procedure at the index level, the indication for surgery was nonunion in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Si-CaP is an effective bone graft substitute. At the latest follow-up, favorable radiographic and clinical outcome was observed in the majority of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III.

DOI10.1097/BSD.0000000000000432
Alternate JournalClin Spine Surg
PubMed ID27623299